Home
 
Quick Tour Break Out Room Login
 
HR buddies

The Covent Garden HR Buddies is an initiative facilitated by Clarkslegal to offer the London HR community the opportunity to meet with like-minded peers, attend relevant seminars and workshops and boost your knowhow of the issues specific to this sector.
 
It’s free and open to anyone interested in HR. It sets its own agenda, so it can be purely social or facilitate presentations to help prevent HR problems for companies in the London area. So if you want to network face to face contact
buddy@clarkslegal.comClick here for further details about our next HR Buddies event.  

If, alternatively, you wish to network online with other HR professionals, then using the discussion forum below, is your ideal opportunity to do so.

Please feel free to post new queries or questions, and/or reply to ones already posted. All you have to do is register a few details, then you will be ready to post your thoughts.

You can post a new query by selecting the tab "new thread". To reply to a post, select that post and then choose the "reply" tab.

Discussion zone
SearchForum Home
     
  Discussions  Buddy's question time  Third party pre...
 Third party pressure
 
creynolds
115 posts
5th
Joined
12/12/2006

Third party pressure
Posted: 09 Nov 07 9:39 AM
This week buddy was asked:  I have been told by one of my clients that they no longer want one of my contractor’s on site, what are my options?
creynolds
115 posts
5th
Joined
12/12/2006

Re: Third party pressure
Posted: 19 Nov 07 10:52 AM Modified By creynolds  on 11/19/2007 10:53:35 AM)

Buddy says: Employees have the right not to be unfairly dismissed. If as a consequence of a third party request, you are no longer able to employ the individual, you must show that the reason you relied on for dismissing the employee falls within on of the six potentially fair reasons for dismissal: capability or qualifications, conduct, retirement, redundancy, illegality or some other substantial reason (SOSR). Once you have established a potentially fair reason for dismissal a tribunal will then decide whether, considering the employer’s size and administrative resources, the employer acted reasonably in relying on that reason as sufficient to dismiss the employee. A tribunal will look at the merits of each case individually.

 

Employer information: There can be a number of reasons why a third party may refuse to allow an employee on their premises, such as poor performance, misconduct or lack of need for work to be performed. The options available to an employer in responding to the request of a third party will vary according to any contractual agreement between the parties. In assessing the options available you should consider the following:

 

1. Is there a contractual agreement that permits the third party to require the removal of an employee from their premises?

  • Where such a clause exists it should allow for notice to be given to the employer of the individual. This will give the employer time to consider the options available, for example redeploying the employee to another site.
  • Request written notice from the third party, citing the reasons why the employee is no longer wanted on the premises.
  • Some contracts may require you to replace the departing employee with a substitute, at your own cost. 

2. Inform your employees that a clause requiring their removal from a third party premises exists in their contract. In the absence of such a clause an employer may be forced to provide alternative employment.

 

3. When a request for removal is made, consider the following alternatives to dismissal: 

  • Whether or not dismissal will result in injustice to the employee and what the extent of the injustice might be.
  • Find out why the employee is no longer wanted on the premises. Any reason given by a third party could affect the options open to you. It is important to show that you acted reasonably, explored the options available and treated the employee fairly.
  • Explore the options available: If there are allegations of misconduct, consider the need for investigating and possible disciplinary action. Likewise, if the work at a particular site has dried up, do not rush into making the employee redundant if s/he could be redeployed elsewhere. The options available to you may vary according to the size and resources of the business. Where there are allegations of misconduct, the third party may take some persuading to allow the employee to return. 
If the third party insists that the employee no longer works on their premises and after all options above are considered, it may be fair to dismiss the employee. In this situation it would be open to the employer to argue that the dismissal is on the grounds of SOSR in addition to any of the other potentially fair reasons for dismissal. A tribunal will look at whether the employer’s decision fell within the “band of reasonable responses”. Whatever the decision, employers should ensure that a paper trail is kept, outlining any steps taken.  This will provide valuable evidence to bolster a defence to any allegations of unfair dismissal, should the matter end up in tribunal.
  Discussions  Buddy's question time  Third party pre...
 
Clarkslegal LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales. Registered number: OC308349. VAT registration number: 198 9098 84. Registered office: One Forbury Square, The Forbury, Reading RG1 3EB. Solicitors regulated by the Law Society. References to Partners are to members of Clarkslegal LLP. Clarkslegal LLP is a member of the TAGLaw worldwide network of law firms. * Trade Mark Applied.