TUPE: Red-circling terms not a breach of Equal Pay

Comments Posted on: Thursday, 21 July 2011 12:58 PM | Category: TUPE Blog

Under TUPE, transferring employees have the right retain their existing terms of employment.  This can lead to problems under the Equal Pay legislation as it can result in a pay disparity between men and women.  

The EAT in Skills Development Scotland v Buchanan (2011) has now held that “red-circling” an individual’s pay, to comply with TUPE, can amount to a genuine material factor defence to an equal pay claim, where this results in a disparity in pay between a man and a woman. 

Moreover, the employer is under no duty to narrow the pay gap after the transfer (e.g. by freezing the transferred employees’ pay) provided that any decision to award subsequent pay rises to all staff (thus continuing the pay gap) is not tainted by sex.  In other words, it will be a defence to an equal pay claim where the TUPE transfer was and remains the main cause of the pay disparity and it had nothing to do with sex.

Claire Rughani
Tel: 0118 953 3999
Fax: 0118 939 5799
Register for our free weekly HR bulletins
Register here to receive our free weekly HR bulletins, which include our online articles, podcasts and event details.
LEAVE YOUR COMMENTS:
Be the first to comment on this article.
Name *  
Your E-mail address *   
Your telephone number *    
Comments *   
Your comments will be published after being approved by employmentbuddy team, displaying your name as you provide it. But your contact details will never be published. Please read our Terms and Conditions.
Contact us
E-mail: contact@employmentbuddy.com
Telephone: 0118 953 3955
Available on the iPhone App Store Available on the Google play store Available on the BlackBerry App World: This link will open in a new window

Clarkslegal is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales. Registered number OC308349. Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA no. 403601)