Human resources at a click

Union bids for recognition with end user not employer

office-working-going-through-security-turnstiles-reception

This week a trade union, IWGB, has applied for statutory recognition to represent a group of receptionists, security officers and porters who work at the University of London even though these workers are employed by Cordant Security, a facilities management company with the contract to provide services to the University.

The union has described the University as the “de facto employer” and asserted that UK law, if it prevents these workers from collectively bargaining directly with the University, is in breach of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).

Even if the financial terms of Cordant’s contract with the University place a practical limit on Cordant’s scope for increasing the pay of these workers, and University managers can instruct Cordant employees to carry out certain tasks, it is very difficult to see how the union can substantiate its claim that the University is the “de facto employer” unless there is evidence that Cordant is not the actual employer responsible for matters such as hiring, pay, disciplinaries and grievances.

The union has described the University as the “de facto employer” and asserted that UK law, if it prevents these workers from collectively bargaining directly with the University, is in breach of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).

It will therefore be very surprising if this application results in either a finding that the union can negotiate directly with the University or that UK law is in breach of ECHR.

There is no suggestion that there is anything preventing the union from seeking recognition by Cordant, provided it meets the statutory tests. The union has in fact done so, albeit without media fanfare, at the same time as its application for direct recognition by the University.

This is an interesting one to keep track of…watch this space for updates as this progresses.

Clarkslegal’s employment lawyers are here to help. For further information or if you have any questions, please do not hesitate to get in touch with our employment lawyers.

Disclaimer This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking professional and legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.
Employmentbuddy
Employment Team

Related Articles

April brings the next tranche of reforms under the Employment Rights Act 2025 (which received royal assent on 18 December...

Substantial union-related changes under the Employment Rights Act 2025 will take effect on 18 February 2026, ushering in significant shifts...

The new trade union rights introduced by the Employment Rights Act 2025 will come into force on 18 February 2026....

Related Resources

Letter to employees involved in industrial action for over 12 weeks and employer is considering dismissal

Template letter explaining potential dismissal to employees who have been involved in industrial action for more than 12 weeks. Preview...

Letter to employees who will be participating in a ballot for industrial action

Template letter to those participating in a ballot for industrial action. Preview of letter Dear [name] Over the past [period...

Ballot to endorse a pre existing agreement checklist

Checklist on ballot to endorse a pre- existing agreement. Identify employees who should be covered by the ballot (this could...

Human resources at a click